Specifics of Juvenile Traffic Court

In recent articles, we have explored the differences between adult court and juvenile court in Ohio. We focussed mostly on adult criminal convictions and how they differ from juvenile delinquent adjudications. But how do things change when we start talking about traffic court? Here are some specifics of juvenile traffic court.

Pleas in Juvenile Traffic Court

The plea process, like the plea process for other juvenile offenses, differs from the adult plea process in the terms used for the pleas. The alleged offender enters either a plea of “denial” or “admission” (which parallel the “guilty” and “not guilty” pleas in adult court).

The Requirement for Juveniles to Appear in Court

Unlike adult court, juvenile traffic offenders are required to make an appearance in court. Even if the offender simply intends to make a plea of admission, they must appear. If you or your child are summoned to juvenile traffic court, you may have some questions. If so, feel free to contact Dearie, Fischer & Martinson with any questions.

You can read more about juvenile traffic process on our page dedicated to what you should expect with a juvenile traffic charge.

Consequences of Juvenile Traffic Adjudications

If you are adjudicated a juvenile traffic offender, the consequences can in some way be more severe than in adult traffic cases. Suspensions and restrictions can be longer and imposed for lesser offenses. The court feels that it is safer to be more strict with juveniles who are still learning to drive and more prone to mistakes.

Conclusion

While the proceedings in adult court and juvenile court are similar, there are different factors to consider in each one. There are also different factors to consider between traffic and other criminal cases. If you have questions about the specifics of juvenile traffic court or need legal representation of any kind in Ohio, be sure to contact Dearie, Fischer & Martinson.